GFI MailEssentials

How can we improve?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Resolve MailEssentials design failure regarding free RAM percentage for SpamTag instead of ADSI

    as it`s in the nature of any MS Database, including MS Exchange, the DB grabs as much RAM as available, needed or not. Out-of-the-box there is in opposite to MS SQL Server also no Exchange Feature to limit the RAM usage.
    Only ADSI could be used to set some Exchange limits, but as this could cause other problems with Exchange Update Rollups, migrations, or the general Exchange performance, this would be a last resort for a skilled Exchange and AD admin.
    To solve the problem with the SpamTag URL check while installing, if there isn`t more then 10% free RAM…

    2 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Exchange  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. PGP-Gateway function for encrypted emails on organization level

    nowadays, more and more companys are forced to send only encrypted mails, if the mail contains personal data. Currently, we work with AXA insurance, where it is pretty inconvenient for the users to download all these mails with a 1-time pwd. from an AXA webmail service. It would be great, if GFI MailEssentials could offer an additional module which integrates in the antispam/ antivirus solution to offer an PGP-Gateway function for encrypted emails on organization level, as you could mark these mails as "no spam", if they are recognized as successfull encrypted with the corresponding certificates.

    Some resources/ procucts from…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Exchange  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. MailEssentials on a domain member server should be capabele to scan internal traffic

    ... which would be a prefered solution considering compatibility issues and also offers a solution for a smarthost in a DMZ without additional costs.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Exchange  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Public Folder Scanning

    Users sometimes drag inappropriate items to "Add to blocklist" in public folders. One example is items that were already classified as spam by GFI. It seems that many of these items cause Public Folder Scanning to fail going forward. I went back and forth with support on this issue and was asked to put this in as a feature request. Frankly, I see this as a bug and/or bad program design, but nonetheless, here goes. Feature Request - if GFI doesn't know how to handle something in Public Folders, skip it and move on to the next item rather than…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Exchange  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

GFI MailEssentials

Feedback and Knowledge Base