Rob Richman

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman commented  · 

    This is one of the most important features that seems to be overlooked!!! i can't believe faxmaker online through the desktop client (for secure faxing purposes) can't get notification emails. it is authenticating with GFI, so it knows who the user is, and should be able to send the confirmation success or failure. this needs to be fixed immediately!!! fax confirmation sheets are a necessity to prove that they went through.!!!

    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
  4. 5 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi

    Thanks for your request. Can you please confirm if you have run this past support?

    if you have not done so , can you please do so and kindly advise the ticket number. If you do have a support ticket, kindly advise the Case number so that we may look into with the datacenter team.

    Rob Richman commented  · 

    Case# GFI-170123-447265
    Yes i ran it past them and they said that sending out bound they pick any number (seems so far to be the same number) and even if you PORT a number over it won't use that number it will still use a GFI random number.

    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  5. 12 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  1 comment  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  7. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
  9. 6 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
  10. 8 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  GFI FaxMaker Online  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
  11. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Reviewed  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI FaxMaker  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman commented  · 

    [Comment date: 2013-10-31]
    I just noticed if I click on the item it goes in to more detail and I can infact download the suspicious item from mailessentials, but still leaves my other thought of having it submittable directly to gfi public sandbox from within gfi. :)

    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  5 comments  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman commented  · 

    [Comment date: 2013-11-08]
    I am all for 'options' so I agree if it would make your life easier then yes I agree there could be an option to let you change that setting. However for me I would not recommend letting the user make that decision for malware detections. I have found that users don't seem to have the best judgement and that is why I too have placed the .zip extension on a content filter. I did just post another idea that suggests to move the content filter after the spam filter, so that it limits user notifications to mostly legit ones as mostly the bad ones would have already been stopped by the spam razor or Bayesian, etc.

  14. 21 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    14 comments  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Putting Content Filtering after Spam Filtering introduces a huge vulnerability in GFI MailEssentials. This is because Spam Filtering is treated as as non harmful as much as content filtering is supposed to.

    Our suggestion is to:
    Deploy GFI MailEssentials in a DMZ in front of your email server. Only enable Spam Filtering and set it to delete obvious spam. The Delete option is fundamental here otherwise you would end up with the same vulnerability we do not want to include.

    Note: You do not need any extra GFI MailEssentials licensing to do so. The same license can be used since it’s for the same mailboxes.

    Rob Richman commented  · 

    [Comment date: 2014-01-14]
    Yes, Content filter should be 'last' in the list.. Now that .zip extensions are being used so much now... my clients/employees are getting tons of notifications. Unfortunately I have to enable the notification for .zip because 2 out of 10 are legit.. yes people still use .zip for legitimate purposes... so they then forward to me to 'release' from the quarantine. However 8 out of 10 are virus/malware or spam. I really wish this was implemented soon to eliminate most of the unnecessary notifications for content filtering. Please... At least make it an option so we can decide which priority works best.. like we can change the spam filter priority... we should also be able to change the actual 3 filter categories (virus/spam/content). some may prefer different orders... but for me I am getting inundated with .zip notifications that would have been just deleted if malware scan was first.

    Rob Richman commented  · 

    [Comment date: 2014-04-01]
    Any update on this, this is becoming more and more annoying for my end users.... more malware and spam are coming in through .zip files... but since .zip may not necessarily be bad, I have it set to send an email notification to end user so if it is legit they can forward to me to release from quarantine. however maybe 5 out of 100 are legit.. so end users are inundated with notifications. Looking at the .zip quarantine.. most would have been filtered out from malware or other spam filters first... thus reducing the notification. I am begging to have the option to change the order of the content filter to be 'behind' the malware and spam filters.

    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  15. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  16. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  17. 3 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  18. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  19. 4 votes
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI MailEssentials  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
  20. 1 vote
    Sign in
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Collecting Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  GFI Archiver  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Rob Richman supported this idea  · 
    Rob Richman shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base