Luciano Morales

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Kerio Control » authentication  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  3. 79 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  4. 95 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  5. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  6. 333 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Kerio Control » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  7. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Kerio Control » VPN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales commented  · 

    Hi Again!

    I´m, trying to setup L2L VPN tunnel with google cloud and because Kerio Control Does not support parameter config from the GUI I´m forced to setup it from Kerio Control Shell, this means that i have to restart Kerio Control service and also this means that the configuration must be done outside office hours.

    We need more control for VPN parameters, maybe in an "advanced settings" tab.

    I cannot tell to google cloud nor vCloud Air cloud that they must adapt my Kerio Control Settings, Kerio control must be adaptable to any situation.

    I have 5 Kerio Control virtual appliances and i have this problem in all of them!

    This is a MUST feature taht we need ASAP!

    BTW: I wasted a support case with this, the "automatic" option does not work!:

    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_256/3DES_CBC/BLOWFISH_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/AES_XCBC_96/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[IKE] received 10800s lifetime, configured 3600s
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[IKE] no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 3394521165 [ HASH N(NO_PROP) ]
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[NET] sending packet: from 200.69.225.125[500] to 104.154.69.15[500] (76 bytes)
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[NET] received packet: from 104.154.69.15[500] to 200.69.225.125[500] (316 bytes)
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[ENC] parsed QUICK_MODE request 3855708976 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[CFG] looking for a child config for 10.8.0.0/24 === 192.168.81.0/24
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[CFG] proposing traffic selectors for us:

  8. 77 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Kerio Control » VPN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
    Luciano Morales commented  · 

    Hi Again!

    I´m, trying to setup L2L VPN tunnel with google cloud and because Kerio Control Does not support parameter config from the GUI I´m forced to setup it from Kerio Control Shell, this means that i have to restart Kerio Control service and also this means that the configuration must be done outside office hours.

    We need more control for VPN parameters, maybe in an "advanced settings" tab.

    I cannot tell to google cloud nor vCloud Air cloud that they must adapt my Kerio Control Settings, Kerio control must be adaptable to any situation.

    I have 5 Kerio Control virtual appliances and i have this problem in all of them!

    This is a MUST feature taht we need ASAP!

    BTW: I wasted a support case with this, the "automatic" option does not work!:

    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_256/3DES_CBC/BLOWFISH_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/AES_XCBC_96/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[IKE] received 10800s lifetime, configured 3600s
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[IKE] no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 3394521165 [ HASH N(NO_PROP) ]
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[NET] sending packet: from 200.69.225.125[500] to 104.154.69.15[500] (76 bytes)
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[NET] received packet: from 104.154.69.15[500] to 200.69.225.125[500] (316 bytes)
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[ENC] parsed QUICK_MODE request 3855708976 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[CFG] looking for a child config for 10.8.0.0/24 === 192.168.81.0/24
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[CFG] proposing traffic selectors for us:

    Luciano Morales commented  · 

    Need this too!
    I have many problems with L2L VPNs with CISCO ASA, plus if I have to change parameters on Kerio it must be done thru linux Shell and then restart Kerio service.

  9. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Kerio Control » VPN  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Roman Jokl responded

    I don’t see reason for changing the key lifetime. It is automatic process that user shouldn’t be aware of. The only case is if the re-keying doesn’t work and increasing lifetime is a workaround. Such a bug should be fixed in the first place.

    Luciano Morales commented  · 

    Hi Again!

    I´m, trying to setup L2L VPN tunnel with google cloud and because Kerio Control Does not support parameter config from the GUI I´m forced to setup it from Kerio Control Shell, this means that i have to restart Kerio Control service and also this means that the configuration must be done outside office hours.

    We need more control for VPN parameters, maybe in an "advanced settings" tab.

    I cannot tell to google cloud nor vCloud Air cloud that they must adapt my Kerio Control Settings, Kerio control must be adaptable to any situation.

    I have 5 Kerio Control virtual appliances and i have this problem in all of them!

    This is a MUST feature taht we need ASAP!

    BTW: I wasted a support case with this, the "automatic" option does not work!:

    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] selecting proposal:
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] no acceptable DIFFIE_HELLMAN_GROUP found
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] received proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/MODP_1024/NO_EXT_SEQ
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[CFG] configured proposals: ESP:AES_CBC_128/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:3DES_CBC/HMAC_SHA1_96/NO_EXT_SEQ, ESP:AES_CBC_128/AES_CBC_192/AES_CBC_256/3DES_CBC/BLOWFISH_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/AES_XCBC_96/HMAC_MD5_96/NO_EXT_SEQ
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[IKE] received 10800s lifetime, configured 3600s
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[IKE] no matching proposal found, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[ENC] generating INFORMATIONAL_V1 request 3394521165 [ HASH N(NO_PROP) ]
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:31] {charon} charon: 16[NET] sending packet: from 200.69.225.125[500] to 104.154.69.15[500] (76 bytes)
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[NET] received packet: from 104.154.69.15[500] to 200.69.225.125[500] (316 bytes)
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[ENC] parsed QUICK_MODE request 3855708976 [ HASH SA No KE ID ID ]
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[CFG] looking for a child config for 10.8.0.0/24 === 192.168.81.0/24
    [05/Oct/2016 12:14:32] {charon} charon: 08[CFG] proposing traffic selectors for us:

    Luciano Morales commented  · 

    Roman, we need this ASAP, advanced IPsec options from the GUI.
    Kerio Control must be adaptable to the customer existing devices, not the existing device to Kerio Control.
    I´m have so much troubles with the automatic options of Kerio Control for VPN and Cisco ASA.

    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  10. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  11. 208 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Heather P responded

    Thanks for the idea. We haven’t assigned this idea to a release yet, but we welcome further comments and votes if this is important to you.

    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  12. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  13. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  14. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  15. 42 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Kerio Control » content filtering  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  16. 186 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Kerio Control » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 
  17. 105 votes
    Vote
    Sign in Sign in with GFI
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Kerio Control  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Luciano Morales supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base